Motion as the Underlying Essence of Mass and All Forms of Energy

By RE CASTEL

In pure kinematics, motion is typically described in terms of displacement per unit time – i.e., velocity and acceleration. In the extension of pure kinematics, motion is described in terms of its transformations as mass or energy.

Motion is observed and measured relative to a frame of reference. There are two basic frames of reference relative to which motion can be determined.

The first basic frame of reference is the void. The void possesses the essentially zero motion because the motions inherent in the void are stilled or cancelled out, resulting therefore in the average zero motion of the void and its darkness relative to which other motions may be observed or measured.

For example, we may observe with distinction a flash of light with the darkness of the void as the background contrast. Also, we may measure the translations of electromagnetic waves relative to the average zero motion of the void – for example, the cosmic background radiation which is some 2.7 K or its equivalent in the electromagnetic wavelength and frequency measurement against the essentially absolute zero of the void that serves as the perfect blackbody.

The second frame of reference is that of the tensor centers, by which the radiant and the concentric translations (also, the expansions and the contractions) can be measured in terms of the mass-or-energy transformations brought about by the tensor translations.

The most fundamental tensor centers appear to be the stabilized nuclear particles. But the range of tensor centers includes the atoms and molecules, all the gravitational centers, the planets and stars, the so-called blackholes, the galaxies, the clusters and super-clusters of galaxies, and so on. And, apparently, the picture of the cosmos portrays a hierarchy of tensor centers.

The tensor centers absorb and emit the various forms of motion that enter their domains. The tensor centers provide varied conditions for the transformations of motion. Some tensor centers provide for the transformations of the energy forms of motion into the mass forms of motion. Others simply absorb and emit the energy forms of motion that enter their domains – such as when an atom absorbs energy quanta over a certain period and then discretely radiates the energy quanta perhaps in another frequency. And this is also saying that all the tensor centers are inherently brought to their averaged stabilities.

It appears that the tensor centers, after a period of mass-energy increases, eventually undergo the radiation/fission process whereby they are brought to the averaged stabilities that are inherently caused according to the condensing and the attenuating processes in the cosmic hierarchy of tensor centers.

The occurrence of the stabilization of the tensor centers into their averaged stabilities suggests that there is no absolute blackhole with infinite mass. There can only be blackholes of limited or finite masses – because the blackholes are constrained to fission at some point in their tensor translations that increase their mass-energy content.

Clearly, if a blackhole of infinite mass exists, then there would be no cosmos. All that would have existed would be the infinite void and the absolute blackhole with an infinite mass. The whole existence would then have been composed solely of the void and the chaos of a singular blackhole – instead of the dark void and the cosmos of innumerable glorified tensor centers. The whole existence would then have been a picture of the void endlessly sucked and condensed into the single blackhole. Nevertheless, the existence of the cosmos suggests that there are no absolute blackholes.

The existence of the cosmos suggests that the cosmos is composed of innumerable tensor centers with limited masses that together sum up to an infinite total mass. The infinitely numerous components of the cosmos, with their individually limited masses, tally up to an infinite total mass.

According to the suggestions of the formulation of the tensor translations (i.e., the genesis formula) it appears that the cosmos is continually shredding and gobbling up the emergent motions from the void. The cosmos feeds on the emergent motions from the void via the tensor centers (i.e., the gravitational seed masses) in the cosmos. And thus, there is the continual creation of new cosmic mass-energy out of the unorganized or essentially chaotic motions from the void.

Now, in terms of the conventional ideas, motion is described as the motion of objects. But the general definitions regarding what the objects are comprised of are usually not given in terms that name the clearly fundamental essences – for instance, mass as comprising the objects in motion, which mass is now known as itself a form of motion according to the now obvious suggestions from the formulations relating the transformations of motion.

Although we have been given the mass-energy relation from a formulation (the famed relativistic mass equation) that describes a velocity (motion) transformation, we have never been told that the fundamental essence of all forms of mass and energy is the essence of motion. Indeed, we have never been given the clear statement that the fundamental essence of mass and energy is motion.

We have been given the idea that regards energy in various forms – such as heat energy, mechanical energy, chemical energy, kinetic energy, potential energy, gravitational energy, electric and magnetic energy, nuclear binding energy, and the like. There is a seeming multiplicity regarding the fundamental essence underlying the idea of energy. However, it is obvious that the underlying idea in all the terms used to designate the various forms of energy is the idea of the fundamental essence of motion.

Clearly, motion is the underlying essence of mass and all forms of energy. Motion is the underlying and defining essence of the physical, the corporeal, the material substance of existence. All tangible things – i.e., mass and energy – are constructs of motion. All tangible things (the phenomenal, as opposed to the noumenal, intangible abstract things) are kinetic constructs.

The clear statement that motion is the underlying essence of mass and all energy now easily becomes the unifying principle of all theories – the unifying principle for the theory of everything. All the valid theories in physics can now therefore be interpreted in terms of the transformations of motion.

Among the cosmological implications of the idea of motion transformations, especially as applied to the concerted tensor translation of the whole cosmos, is that regarding the cosmic background radiation and the continuous mass formation and hence the cosmic expansion. As already explained elsewhere, the tensor centers (i.e., all the gravitational domains in the cosmos) are essentially gravitational sinks that facilitate the shredding of the emergent motions-or-energy from the dark void.

The above description of the motion transformations, according to the suggestion from the full tensor formulation of the genesis formula, implies –

(1) that half of the overall emergent motions drawn from the void is absorbed and then emitted by the gravitational domains, which is the most plausible cosmic process that accounts for the observed cosmic background radiation (half of the value computed using the genesis formula actually correlates with the empirical measurements of the observed cosmic background radiation), and

(2) that the other half of the overall emergent motions drawn from the void is condensed in the gravitational domains and transformed into mass, which is the most plausible cause of the cosmic expansion since the increasing momentum of the cosmic gravitational domains clearly suggests their spiraling orbits.

What proof do we have that supports the idea of an infinite store of energy in the void?

What proof do we have that supports the idea of continuous cosmic mass formation?

The simple answer is that the tensor vector of gravitation exists and indicates continuous three-dimensional motion towards the gravitational domains of the cosmos.

There is therefore the never-ending relative tensor motion of the cosmos that results in the creation of new cosmic (organized) mass and energy/motions out of the chaotic (unorganized) energy/motions inherent in the void. The never-ending relative tensor motion of the cosmos indicates a never-ending cosmic genesis, a never-ending increase in cosmic mass and energy.

Once again we can freely think of the existence in the familiar stage of space and time.

The confused idea of spacetime transformations within an unknown something was proponed by someone who got rid of the idea of a hylic reality within space, according to the argument that if "no particular state of motion belongs to the ether," then there is no need to introduce it "as an entity of a special sort alongside space."

But now the aethereal hylic reality is ascribed a zero magnitude of motion as its particular state of motion. It is now evident that every gravitational domain in the cosmos has the tensor motion relative to the zero motion of the void that is occupied by the ethereal medium of all motions. We now have the aethereal hylic reality that is given the physical definitions by the transformations of motion. And so, the familiar stage returns.

We now have the view wherein we have the aethereal substance of existence that is given its definitions by the motion within the space dimension and wherein we have the ephemeral instance of existence that is given its definition by the duration through the time dimension.

And so, once again we can freely think of the whole phenomenal-noumenal existence as inhabiting space and evolving in time.

The two principal choices regarding the physics of the existence are now very clear:

We now may ask: Is it the "arbitrary transformations of space and time"? Or, is it the "transformations of motion as time passes"?

Put another way: Is it the "space-time transformations"? Or, is it the "motion transformations as time passes"?