As illustrated above, the motion of an object (e.g., a ray of light, etc.) passing the vicinity of a gravitational domain is accelerated (curved) because of the gravitational vectors of motion towards the gravitational domain. However, regardless of the passing object that helps confirm by observation the existence of the gravitational vectors enveloping the gravitational domain, it is evident that the gravitational vectors indicate an inherent and unceasing three-dimensional motion towards the gravitational domain.

Now, according to the axiomatic principle of the relativity of motion, a relative acceleration is applicable to the gravitational domain itself. This is obviously not a linear acceleration. Instead, this is a tensor acceleration, which is an acceleration in three dimensions. The four-vector gravitational acceleration shown in the above illustration can actually be resolved into a single vector representing the tensor acceleration. The tensor acceleration can then be interpreted as an acceleration of the motions, and not of anything else, towards the gravitational domain; or, since it is only the three-dimensional motion towards the gravitational domain that is indicated by the four-vector gravitational acceleration, the tensor acceleration can be interpreted as the acceleration of the gravitational domain itself, which is according to the idea that motion is relative. And thence, the clear suggestion from this idea of a tensor acceleration is that fundamentally the tensor acceleration causes the increase in the mass-energy content of the gravitational domain as time passes, as can be shown by the mass-energy genesis formula.

The mass-energy genesis formula,

where m_o is the mass of the gravitational domain, A the gravitational acceleration around the gravitational domain, and where t is the elapsed time,

gives us ΔE (delta E), which is the change or increase in the mass-energy content of the gravitational domain for the given elapsed time.

Now, by extension, because all the gravitational masses in the cosmos inherently have the gravitational tensor acceleration, we have the suggestion that there is inescapably the overall continuous cosmic mass-formation in the cosmos.

The gravitational vectors of motion indicate kinetic energy (i.e., the energy of motion) unceasingly flowing into the gravitational domains from the dark voidness which is the essence of the infinite chaos. The gravitational vectors of motion are inherent to the gravitational domains, and the infinite cosmos evidently contains infinite gravitational domains; so, the whole cosmos must inescapably have the increases in mass-energy forever and ever.

An amazing clarification of the tensor acceleration of the gravitational domains is the idea that gravitational domains are essentially in the perpetual motion that continually synthesizes the visible cosmic energy out of the invisible chaotic energy of the dark voidness. Gravitational domains are essentially the fundamental perpetual motion machines. Thus, we have energy perpetually shredded out of the background chaos and brought into the foreground cosmos.

In sum, the grand suggestion of kinematic relativity is that there is the perpetual bias towards the cosmic mass-formation because of the unceasing gravitation.

As for web articles on kinematics, I have not as yet found any that discusses the kinematics principles solely in terms of the motions of motions. Most of the kinematics articles found in the web still put forth the idea that the simplest application of kinematics is that of 'particles' in translational or rotational motion. Most of the kinematics articles found in the web still do not bring the discussions to the fundamental level that regard solely the motions of motions in themselves. It is also at present rather too much to hope for any web article on kinematics that clearly regard the idea that the particles and bodies and masses in motion are themselves actually constructs of motions. Perhaps the reader could just consider the web article on kinematics found here.

Now, in order to properly relate the ideas in the articles found in the web with the ideas presented here and in the ebook, one must carefully consider some rather novel ideas and perspectives. A principal consideration in understanding the idea of the gravitational tensor acceleration as presented here and in the ebook is to bear in mind that the tensors are descriptions of motions or of the tendencies of motions. Thus, in order to understand the discussions in the ebook, one must put aside the application of the idea of tensors as properties of space or of spacetime.

In other words, one must consider that the tensors fundamentally describe the properties of motion. It should be a clear consideration that the application of the word 'curvature' as used in the ebook regards the idea of the acceleration of motion and not the idea of the curvature of space or of spacetime according to the Einsteinian perspectives. A proper understanding of the ideas presented in the ebook can be achieved only upon the consideration that it is the motions that are moved or curved or accelerated or folded in manifolds – as opposed to the Einsteinian idea of the purported motions of space or of spacetime.

It must be noted that in most of the pages found in the web the idea of tensors is mostly applied to regard the idea of the motions of space (or of spacetime) – as is the convention in the Einsteinian perspectives. This is because the idea of the space-filling aether has been discarded by Einstein, who basically proposed that space itself (or an aether-like essence called space or alternatively a spacetime continuum) is the essence that is transformed by or applied with the motions.

In the ebook, basically, the idea of the aether is maintained as the space-filling essence that is given the 'texture' by the motions, but this is with the principal consideration that it is the motions that are moved according to the pure kinematic principles. Thus, in the ebook, the idea is that space is only a container of the aether which is the space-filling essence that is given the 'texture' by the motions. Space is not moving at all, neither is it curved.

The idea in the ebook is that it is the essence of motion that is moved – that is, we have only the motions of motions, we have only the constructs of motions within space. All forms of phenomena, be it in the form of mass or of energy, are actually constructs of motions. We therefore actually have only the fields (or the infinite field) of the motions on the space-filling aether within space. Thus, the thing that receives the transformations or change in phenomena is motion itself, and space is only an unchanging background of the transformations of motion.

So, in the past, we have in the Einsteinian perspectives the transformations, curvature, acceleration, expansions, contractions, warping of the manifolds of space or spacetime – and we have the equivalence of mass and energy on the side. And in these old perspectives we have the confusing interpretations of the mathematical equations and formulations.

But now, in the new perspectives presented in the ebook, we have the transformations, curvature, acceleration, expansions, contractions, warping of the manifolds, not of space or spacetime, but that of the motions – and now we have the idea that mass and energy are actually of the fundamental essence of motion. So, mass and energy are forms or constructs of motion. And so, in these new perspectives, we can now have the more clarifying interpretations of the mathematical equations and formulations.

We may now understand that there is the fundamental acceleration suggested by the gravitational field equations. Because the principles of kinematic relativity, according to the idea of the transformations of motion, has established the idea that "mass increases as velocity increases," then there must be continuous mass formation in the accelerating gravitational domains. This by extension suggests that there is a fundamental process of cosmic continuous mass formation.

The idea of cosmic continuous mass formation actually yields an explanation as to why there is a cosmic background radiation, which is actually a by-product of the continuous mass formation process. And this idea of cosmic continuous mass formation also actually yields an answer as to why there is the expansion of the cosmos.

Inherently, the idea of cosmic continuous mass formation suggests that the cosmos expands because the cosmic momentum of each of all the gravitational domains in the cosmos increases as the mass content of each gravitational domain increases.

In other words, because the gravitational field suggests that gravitational domains accelerate and their acceleration suggests the increases in the mass content of the gravitational domains, therefore all the gravitational domains with the increasing masses (and hence, the increases in their momentum) have the increasing or spiraling or precessing orbits around the centers of the cosmic systems to which they belong in the cosmos... The idea of increasing or spiraling or precessing orbits is actually the underlying suggestion of the essence of the expansion of the cosmos...

I am sure that all the relevant equations and formulations in our physics can be interpreted in terms of the transformations of motion. All the mathematical equations and formulations can be interpreted as definitions of the transformations of the fundamental essence of motion itself, which is the fundamental essence of all the phenomena seen in nature.

I could have tried discussing the ideas presented here and in the ebook in terms of the technical language and mathematical discoveries familiar to those who embrace the older conventions. However, that would have demanded too many years of in-depth research for me to gain a mastery of and a convincing or acceptable reputation regarding the said conventions. The discussions would still have remained rooted on the premise of the older perspective, which would have severely hindered the advancement of the discussions onto premise of the new perspectives set forth here and in the ebook. By directly bringing the discussions over onto the premise of the new perspectives the necessary effort for the presentation of the new perspectives has been relatively easier.

Let me now present a fundamental idea to start off.

Imagine the existence of space with only the darkness and voidness in it. Consider that space is infinite and that there is an infinite darkness and voidness in that infinite space.

Consider now that that infinite darkness and voidness actually is an infinite store of energy. (This is actually already one of the quantum theory ideas.) Consider that energy in the fundamental sense is motion – the energy of motion. Now, consider that motion can be in the form of radiation, and that motion can be wrapped onto itself in particulate forms, and that the motions can also cancel each other out into the form of a dark voidness. And so, consider that the infinite darkness and voidness in that infinite space is dark and void only because in that dark void all the motions cancel each other out.

Consider for the above idea of the cancelled out motions in the dark void the suggestion from the double-slit experiment, especially regarding the region where the light waves or the photons cancel out into a darkness – that is, the region where the waves or particles meet with destructive interference. (See illustrations and explanations of the double-slit experiment here and here.)

Evidently, the energy or electromagnetic waves actually exist in that region of darkness exhibited by the double-slit experiment. But these electromagnetic waves are however cancelled out into the essence of a dark nothingness because of the destructive interference. Now, let this idea exemplified by the region of destructive interference be extended to the idea of the infinite dark void presented above.

The idea of the infinite darkness and voidness is exactly the idea of the infinite chaos because therein all the motions are cancelled out. There is nothing cosmic (orderly) in that darkness, hence there is no cosmos (order) there. There is no differentiation of energy in that infinite dark void. And thus, that infinite dark void is the essence of chaos because there is nothing there that we can call cosmic. There is no differentiation of motions there that may suggest the idea of order. Or in other words, there is no differing forms of energy in that dark void. There is nothing there than we can say as having more energy than another, and so, there is no order in that dark void.

So, to clarify, we started off with the idea of an infinite space within which there is the infinite dark void that we call the chaos. Let us now improve the picture a little bit.

Let us now introduce into that dark void the essence of a particle that has mass and see what will happen.

Because the particle we introduce or immerse into the dark void has mass, it inherently brings with it the essence of the gravitational field. The gravitational field is inherently with the mass. And it is a field of motions towards the given mass. Regardless of whether there are other particles or not, the gravitational field, as illustrated by the vectors of motion around the mass we have introduced into the picture, inherently exists because the mass exists. The particle therefore presents what we may call a kinetic bias – which is a region of kinematic acceleration or a kinematic curvature. And this kinematic curvature is immersed in the smooth darkness of the voided motions in the chaos all around it.

According to our mathematical formulations as elucidated by the genesis formula, this curvature or acceleration by its nature shreds the cancelled out motions from the surrounding dark void because of its inherent kinetic bias. So, as time passes this particle will increase in its mass (energy) content because it is accelerating with a tensor acceleration due to the effects of the gravitational field.

Now, the single particle, that we introduced into the infinite background which is the dark void, acts essentially as a singularity – and with 'no hair' because it is alone.

We may say it has 'no hair' because there is nothing else in the surrounding smooth background of the dark void that affects and perturbs this lone singularity. So, the singularity is very smooth – 'no hair' at all because there is nothing else that can gravitationally tug at the particle to cause some 'hair' or strands of energy to come out of the singularity.

But introduce another particle into the picture. Now, with two singularities tugging at each other, the suggestion is that the tugging perturbations between the two should cause some hair to come out of the singularities. And when the hairs come out, the singularities could flatten into disk-like bodies and eventually fission into numerous other masses.

However, with just the two singularities there is the possibility that the singularities will also eventually merge and form just a single massive singularity. The suggestion here now is that apparently there must necessarily be an infinite number of other masses immersed in the infinite dark void if the singularities were to remain as separate masses.

Given an infinite number of masses gravitationally tugging at each other, there is no possibility at all for all the masses to come together into a single mass.

Furthermore, because the suggestion is that all the other masses are themselves essentially gravitational seed-masses that also gobble up the background chaos, they also increase in their masses. And with their increased masses, they increase in their momentum and spiral outward in their orbits around their parent masses, and hence cause the expansion which is actually observed in the cosmos.

All these actually suggest that an infinite number of masses must have always existed in the first place, for otherwise there would only be the lone singularity gobbling up the dark void within space. We actually do not have a lone singularity gobbling up the dark void. It is clear that we have a cosmos with apparently an infinite number of masses. Therefore, the suggestion is that an infinite number of masses must have always existed.

So, the clear suggestion is that there is an infinite chaos (the undifferentiated motions) that has always existed and there is an infinite cosmos (the differentiated motions) that has always existed.

The genesis formula that I have presented in my work suggests that the cosmos has always been feeding off the chaos. And there is neither beginning nor end to this process wherein the cosmos continually gains in the mass as it gobbles up and condenses the voided energy out of the chaos.

The genesis formula accounts for the cosmic background radiation with the formula suggesting cbr intensities that fall right smack on the curve of the cbr measurements that we already have.

The genesis formula also accounts for the observed expansion of the cosmos according to the suggestion of the ever increasing mass and momentum of each gravitationally accelerating mass in the cosmos.

The genesis formula also clearly suggests the existence of the continuous cosmic mass formation process.

A clear suggestion from these ideas is the fact that the purported spacetime continuum actually does not exist at all. Instead, we have actually an infinite kinematic (or kinetic) continuum within an infinite space. Thus, we don't have a spacetime fabric. Instead, we have a kinematic fabric within space.

Another clear suggestion is the fact that the purported arbitrary spacetime transformations or arbitrary transformations of space and time do not exist at all. The suggestion is clearly that instead we actually have the transformations of motion wrought by the vectors of motion in the material realm of phenomena.

The idea of the transformations wrought in the abstract realm of noumena by the vector of duration (the time vector) is altogether another matter.

There is also the suggestion of the process wherein there is a cosmic condensation because of the concentric kinetic bias and wherein there is also an attenuation because the cosmic masses spiral out in the cosmic expansion. This process presents a cause whereby the cosmic quantum stabilities of the particulate masses in the cosmos are maintained so that they neither continually collapse as singularities nor unravel altogether into a smooth voidness... In other words, we have the stabilized particulate protons, neutrons, electrons, and the like because of this process.

There is also the suggestion that the speed of light is governed by this process of cosmic condensation and attenuation... The implications from a formulated understanding of this process can only be extraordinary – especially in terms of our understanding of the fundamental forces and the consequent possibilities in our engineering applications...